1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 105 U.S.
  5. 105 U.S. 605 (1882)
 

OGLESBY v. ATTRILL

Not in source.

105 U.S. 605 (1882)

26 L.Ed. 1186

OGLESBY, v. ATTRILL.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 8, 1882.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard De Gray and Mr. Henry Kelly, with whom were Mr. Charles B. Singleton and Mr. Richard H. Browne, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Thomas J. Semmes and Mr. S. Teakle Wallis for the defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

We do not deem it necessary to consider the rulings of the court upon the admission of evidence, nor the instructions given to the jury, nor those refused. The affirmance of the judgment may be rested on the compromise made between the defendants — the petitioners in reconvention — and the company, assuming that in its absence the petition in reconvention discloses a cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases