1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 106 U.S.
  5. 106 U.S. 546 (1883)
 

PIERCE v. INDSETH

Not in source.

106 U.S. 546 (1883)

1 S.Ct. 418

27 L.Ed. 254

PIERCE, v. INDSETH.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 8, 1883.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles E. Flandrau for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Edward C. Palmer for the defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court, and after stating the case as above, proceeded as follows: —

The certificate of the protest of the bill of exchange by the notary in Norway was properly received in evidence. It is in due form, and bears what purports to be the seal of the notary. The seal, it is true, is impressed directly on the paper by a die with which ink was used. This is evident from inspection of the original, which has been transmitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases