1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 52 U.S.
  5. 52 U.S. 587 (1850)
 

HOGG ET AL. v. EMERSON

Not in source.

52 U.S. 587 (1850)

11 How. 587

13 L.Ed. 824

PETER HOGG AND CORNELIUS H. DELAMATER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOHN B. EMERSON.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 18, 1850.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. John O. Sargent, from a brief filed by himself and Mr. Johnson, for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Gillet, for the defendant in error.

Of Mr. Gillet's argument for the defendant in error, the reporter has no notes.

Mr. Justice WOODBURY delivered the opinion of the court.

This is the same case which has been before us on a former occasion, as reported in 6 Howard, 437.

The decision there announced on the points presented by that record was accompanied by a ruling that, in writs of error in patent cases, all the questions of law which arose at the trial might be brought up, and not, as there, only such as the court below should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases