1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 57 U.S.
  5. 57 U.S. 571 (1854)
 

SLICER ET AL. v. THE BANK OF PITTSBURG

Not in source.

57 U.S. 571 (1854)

16 How. 571

14 L.Ed. 1063

WILLIAM J. SLICER, LAWRENCE SLICER, WILLIAM CROMWELL SLICER, AND MARCELLA SLICER, MINORS, BY THEIR FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, WILLIAM J. SLICER, AND MARTHA VIRGINIA BERKLEY, JERMEMIAH BERRY, AND THOMAS CROMWELL BERRY, APPELLANTS, v. THE BANK OF PITTSBURG.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 26, 1854.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. T. Fox Alden and Mr. Johnson, for the appellants, and by Mr. Hepburn and Mr. Loomis, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from the decree of the Circuit Court, for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

The complainants represented in their bill that their ancestor, Thomas Cromwell, was seised of a tract of land, containing one hundred and seventy acres, situate in the county of Alleghany, at or nearly adjoining the city of Alleghany, and also a certain lot of land...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases