1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 66 U.S.
  5. 66 U.S. 518 (1862)
 

HOYT v. SHELDEN

Not in source.

66 U.S. 518 (1862)

1 Black 518

17 L.Ed. 65

HOYT, vs. SHELDEN, EX'R OF THOMPSON, AND THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 20, 1862.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Hoyt, of New York, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Blatchford and Stoughton, of New York, for Thompson's administrator.

Mr. De Forrest, of New York, for the Long Island Railroad Company.

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.

This being a writ of error directed to a State court, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff, in order to give jurisdiction to this court, to show that one of the questions enumerated in the twenty-fifth section of the act of Congress of 1789, Ch. 20, arose at the trial, and that a right he claimed under the Constitution of the United States, or an act of Congress, was decided against him.

In the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases