1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 106 U.S.
  5. 106 U.S. 423 (1882)
 

MOFFITT v. ROGERS

Not in source.

106 U.S. 423 (1882)

1 S.Ct. 70

27 L.Ed. 76

MOFFITT, v. ROGERS.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 30, 1882.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George Harding and Mr. William A. Macleod for the appellant.

Mr. Chauncey Smith and Mr. Thomas L. Wakefield for the appellees.

MR. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court, and, after stating the case, proceeded as follows: —

The evidence leaves no doubt in our minds that the first claim of Moffitt's reissued patent is broader than any claim of his original patent. The original patent covered an elongated heel-shaped former, set eccentrically upon its shaft. This was an essential part of the invention described in the original patent. The specification declares: "I use a `former...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases