1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 46 U.S.
  5. 46 U.S. 1 (1846)
 

WOOD v. UNDERHILL

Not in source.

46 U.S. 1 (1846)

5 How. 1

12 L.Ed. 23

JAMES WOOD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM A. UNDERHILL AND ASCHEL H. GEROW, DEFENDANTS.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 21, 1846.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was argued by Mr. Silliman, for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Rowley, for the defendants.

Mr. Silliman, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Rowley, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

The question presented in this case is a narrow one, and may be disposed of in a few words.

The plaintiff claims that he has invented a new and useful improvement in the art of manufacturing bricks and tiles; and states his invention to consist in using fine anthracite coal, or coal-dust, with clay, for the purpose of making brick or tile; — and for that only he claims a patent. And the only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases