1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 91 U.S.
  5. 91 U.S. 379 (1876)
 

ROMIE ET AL. v. CASANOVA

Not in source.

91 U.S. 379 (1876)

23 L.Ed. 374

ROMIE, ET AL. v. CASANOVA.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 31, 1876.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Submitted on printed arguments by Mr. S.O. Houghton and Mr. John Reynolds for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. John A. Grow, contra.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

No Federal question is presented by the record in this case. The action was brought to recover the possession of certain lands. Both parties claimed title from the city of San José; and the question to be determined was, which of the two had actually obtained a grant of the particular premises in controversy. The title of the city was not drawn in question. Even if it depended upon the treaty of Guadaloupe...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases