1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 46 U.S.
  5. 46 U.S. 410 (1847)
 

FOX v. THE STATE OF OHIO

Not in source.

46 U.S. 410 (1847)

5 How. 410

12 L.Ed. 213

MALINDA FOX v. THE STATE OF OHIO.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 22, 1847.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was argued by Mr. Convers, for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Stanberry (Attorney-General of Ohio), for the State.

The opening and closing arguments of Mr. Convers, for the plaintiff in error, have been consolidated, and will be found after that of Mr. Stanberry.

Mr. Stanberry made the following points: —

Mr. Convers, in reply, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Justice DANIEL delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes before us on a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio, by whose judgment was affirmed the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas for the county of Morgan in that State, convicting the plaintiff of passing, with fraudulent intent, a base and counterfeit coin in the similitude of a good and legal silver dollar, and sentencing her for that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases