UNITED STATES v. LAWRENCE

Not in source.

3 U.S. 42 (1795)

3 Dall. 42

1 L.Ed. 502

UNITED STATES, v. JUDGE LAWRENCE.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 3, 1795.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The rule was opposed by Ingersoll and W. Tilghman, who contended:


A MOTION was made by the Attorney General of the United States (Bradford) for a Rule to shew cause why a mandamus should not be directed to JOHN LAWRENCE, Judge of the District of New-York, in order to compel him to issue a warrant, for apprehending Captain Barre, commander of the frigate Le Perdrix, belonging to the French Republic.

The case was this: — Captain Barre, soon after the dispersion of a French...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases