1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 51 U.S.
  5. 51 U.S. 395 (1851)
 

BALTIMORE AND SUSQUEHANNA RAILROAD CO. v. NESBIT ET AL.

Not in source.

51 U.S. 395 (1851)

10 How. 395

13 L.Ed. 469

THE BALTIMORE AND SUSQUEHANNA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ALEXANDER NESBIT AND PENELOPE D. GOODWIN.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 19, 1851.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Campbell and Mr. Yellot, for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Johnson, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Justice DANIEL delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes before us from the District of Maryland, upon a writ of error to the court of Baltimore County, prosecuted under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act.

The facts from which the questions to be adjudged arise are the following.

The legislature of Maryland, by a law of the 18th of February, 1828, incorporated the plaintiff in error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases