1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 3 U.S.
  5. 3 U.S. 411 (1799)
 

FOWLER v. LINDSEY

Not in source.

3 U.S. 411 (1799)

3 Dall. 411

1 L.Ed. 657

FOWLER et al., v. LINDSEY, et al. FOWLER et al., v. MILLER.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 19, 1799.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The amended rule was argued, by Lewis and Hoffman (the Attorney-General of New-York.)

WASHINGTON, Justice. —

The first question that occurs, from the arguments on the present occasion, respects the nature of the rights, that are contested in the suits, depending in the Circuit Court. Without entering into a critical examination of the Constitution and laws, in relation to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, I lay down the following as a safe rule: That a case which belongs to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, on account of the interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases