1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 60 U.S.
  5. 60 U.S. 342 (1857)
 

BALLANCE v. PAPIN ET AL.

Not in source.

60 U.S. 342 (1857)

19 How. 342

15 L.Ed. 678

CHARLES BALLANCE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ADOLPH PAPIN, HENRY PAPIN, AND MARY ATCHISON.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 5, 1857.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was similar in most of its features to the preceding case, and was argued by Mr. Ballance for the plaintiff in error, and submitted on printed arguments by Mr. Williams and Mr. Gamble for the defendants.

Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

In the case of Charles Ballance against Papin and Atchison, the same title was relied on by the defendant below (Ballance) that was set up in defence in the preceding case of Forsyth v. Brien and Rouse. The plaintiff sued to recover a village lot in Peoria, No. 42, confirmed to Fontaine, in right of his wife, Josette Cassarau, dit Fontaine. A plat of lot No. 42 was given in evidence, and is found in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases