1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 43 U.S.
  5. 43 U.S. 344 (1844)
 

CHOUTEAU v. ECKHART

Not in source.

43 U.S. 344 (1844)

2 How. 344

11 L.Ed. 293

PIERRE CHOUTEAU, SEN., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM ECKHART.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 16, 1844.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawless and Bogg, for the plaintiff in error.

Gamble, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

For the statement of the facts the report is referred to.

It is insisted this court has no jurisdiction to look into the plaintiff's concession of 1800; or to pass on it, under the 25th section of the Judiciary act — and the case in 9 Peters, 244, of New Orleans v. De Armis, is referred to as settling the question. If the plaintiff relied alone on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases