1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 41 U.S.
  5. 41 U.S. 327 (1842)
 

FRESH v. GILSON ET AL.

Not in source.

41 U.S. 327 (1842)

16 Pet. 327

10 L.Ed. 982

WILLIAM H. FRESH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. RIAH GILSON, CHRISTOPHER MIDLAR, AND JAMES FRESH, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 16, 1842.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

This case was argued by Mr. Brent, junior, for the plaintiff in error; and by Mr. Bradley, for the defendants.

Mr. Justice DANIEL delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case arises under the attachment law of the state of Maryland, passed in 1795; and comes before this Court upon a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia, for Washington county; within which the law of Maryland above mentioned is in force. The proceedings instituted in this case, although commencing by an attachment, and upon what is termed a short note in lieu of a formal declaration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases