1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 46 U.S.
  5. 46 U.S. 317 (1847)
 

COMMERCIAL BANK OF CINCINNATI v. BUCKINGHAM'S EXECUTORS

Not in source.

46 U.S. 317 (1847)

5 How. 317

12 L.Ed. 169

THE PRESIDENT, DIRECTORS, AND COMPANY OF THE COMMERCIAL BANK OF CINCINNATI, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EUNICE BUCKINGHAM'S EXECUTORS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 1, 1847.

March 5, 1847.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was argued by Mr. Stanberry (Attorney-General of Ohio) and Mr. Gilpin, for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Charles C. Convers, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Stanberry, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Convers, for defendants in error.

Mr. Gilpin, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Justice GRIER, after giving the statement of the case which is prefixed to this report, proceeded to deliver the opinion of the court.

The first and only question necessary to be decided in the present case is, whether this court has jurisdiction.

To bring a case for a writ of error or an appeal from the highest court of a State, within the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act, it must appear on the face of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases