1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 106 U.S.
  5. 106 U.S. 255 (1882)
 

BADGER v. RANLETT

Not in source.

106 U.S. 255 (1882)

1 S.Ct. 346

27 L.Ed. 194

BADGER, v. RANLETT.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 11, 1882.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Solicitor-General for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. William Wirt Howe and Mr. J.H. Kennard, contra.

MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error contends that the court charged the jury, in substance, that if the goods were, and were known as, cotton-ties, they could not be at the same time band iron; and that this was error. The argument is, that the term "band iron" may include an article known as a "cotton-tie;" that to say that one sort of band iron is known by the name of "cotton-tie" is not to say...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases