1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 91 U.S.
  5. 91 U.S. 254 (1876)
 

HAINES ET AL. v. CARPENTER ET AL.

Not in source.

91 U.S. 254 (1876)

23 L.Ed. 345

HAINES ET AL. v. CARPENTER ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 17, 1876.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Submitted on printed brief by Mr. Joseph Casey for the appellant, who cited Payne v. Hook, 7 Wall. 425.

No counsel appeared for the appellee.

MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

A mere statement of the bill is sufficient to show that it cannot be sustained. Whilst it undoubtedly presents some matters of equitable consideration, they are so mixed up with others of a different character, or which cannot be entertained by the Circuit Court of the United States, and which constitute the main object and purpose of the suit, as to make the bill essentially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases