CLERKE v. HARWOOD

Not in source.

3 U.S. 342 (1797)

3 Dall. 342

1 L.Ed. 628

CLERKE, Plaintiff in error, v. HARWOOD.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 11, 1797.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. and W. Tilghman, for the Plaintiff in error.

Dallas, on the other side, stated, that by the 25th. section of the Judicial Act, the writ of error was to have the same effect in this case.


BY THE COURT. — The judgment of the Superior Court of Maryland being reversed, it has become a mere nullity; and costs must follow the right as decided here.

Let the Judgment of the General Court be affirmed; let the costs in the Courts of Maryland, and in this Court, be allowed to the Plaintiff in error; and let the mandate for execution issue to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases