1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 46 U.S.
  5. 46 U.S. 295 (1847)
 

COOK v. MOFFAT ET AL.

Not in source.

46 U.S. 295 (1847)

5 How. 295

12 L.Ed. 159

WILLIAM G. COOK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN L. MOFFAT AND JOSEPH CURTIS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 15, 1847.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was argued by Mr. Mayer, and Mr. Johnson, for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Hinkley, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Hinkley, for defendants in error.

Mr. R. Johnson, for the plaintiff in error, in reply to Mr. Hinkley, divided the subject into the four following heads: —

Mr. Justice GRIER delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes before us by a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Maryland District.

Moffat & Curtis, merchants in New York, sold goods to Cook, who resided in Baltimore. On a settlement of their accounts, Cook transmitted his notes to his attorney in New York, who delivered them to the defendants in error. After the notes fell due...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases