HILLS v. ROSS

Not in source.

3 U.S. 331 (1796)

3 Dall. 331

1 L.Ed. 623

HILLS et al. v. ROSS.

Supreme Court of United States.

August 12, 1796.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ingersoll, contended, for the Plaintiffs in error.

Tilghman, on the contrary.


On the 11th of August, the CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the COURT, that, in the present case, there was a sufficient legal appearance of all the Defendants.

On the merits, it appeared, that the Plaintiffs in error, had directed to be sold, certain prize cargoes, captured by Captains Talbot and Ballard, under the circumstances, stated in the case of Jansen versus Talbot, (ante p. 133); and that, after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases