1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 2 U.S.
  5. 2 U.S. 300 (1793)
 

LIVINGSTON ET AL. v. SWANWICK

Not in source.

2 U.S. 300 (1793)

2 Dall. 300

LIVINGSTON et al., versus SWANWICK.

Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District.

April 1, 1793.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis, Rawle, Randolph & Dallas for the plaintiffs. E. Tilghman, Ingersoll, Wilcocks and Serjeant for the defendant.*

But, BY THE COURT: — The witness is competent to prove every part of the transaction. He is not interested in the event of the suit; nor can the verdict, in this case, be given in evidence, upon the trial of the action for his commissions. Anderson was a known, established, Broker; and unless he was admitted to give evidence of the instructions he received (which were oral in this case, and are usually so, in similar cases) it would be impracticable to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases