1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 3 U.S.
  5. 3 U.S. 297 (1796)
 

UNITED STATES v. LA VENGEANCE

Not in source.

3 U.S. 297 (1796)

3 Dall. 297

1 L.Ed. 610

LA VENGEANCE. UNITED STATES, v. LA VENGEANCE.

Supreme Court of United States.

August 11, 1796.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

From this judgment of the Circuit Court, a writ of error was brought on behalf of the United States, the general errors were assigned, and the Defendnat in error pleaded in nullo est erratum. The issue was argued on the 10th of August, by Lee, Attorney General of the United States, for the Plaintiff in error, and by Du Ponceau, for the Defendant:(a)

THE CHIEF JUSTICE informed the opposite counsel, that as the court did not feel any reason to change the opinion, which they had formed upon opening the cause, they would dispense with any further argument; and on the 11th of August, he pronounced the following judgment.

BY THE COURT. We are perfectly satisfied upon the two points that have been agitated in this cause. In the first place, we think, that it is a cause of Admiralty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases