1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 92 U.S.
  5. 92 U.S. 183 (1876)
 

SMITH ET AL. v. VODGES, ASSIGNEE

Not in source.

92 U.S. 183 (1876)

23 L.Ed. 481

SMITH ET AL. v. VODGES, ASSIGNEE.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 17, 1876.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. N.H. Sharpless and Mr. Richard C. McMurtrie for the appellants.

Mr. William A. Manderson for the appellee.

MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

The law of this case is too well settled to admit of doubt. In order to defeat a settlement made by a husband upon his wife, it must be intended to defraud existing creditors, or creditors whose rights are expected shortly to supervene, or creditors whose rights may and do so supervene; the settler purposing to throw the hazards of business in which he is about to engage upon others, instead of honestly holding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases