1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 54 U.S.
  5. 54 U.S. 218 (1852)
 

MILLER v. AUSTEN ET AL.

Not in source.

54 U.S. 218 (1852)

13 How. 218

14 L.Ed. 119

HENRY MILLER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. DAVID AUSTEN, WILLIAM S. WILMERDING, AND DAVID AUSTEN, JR., DEFENDANTS.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 21, 1852.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Upon these exceptions the case came up to this court, and was argued by Mr. Fox, for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Chase and Mr. Rockwell, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Chase and Mr. Rockwell.

Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question this case presents that we deem worthy of notice is, whether the paper sued on is a negotiable instrument; it is as follows:

"No. 959. Mississippi Union Bank, Jackson, (Miss.) Feb. 8, 1840. I hereby certify, that Hugh Short has deposited in this bank, payable twelve months from 1st May, 1839, with 5 per cent. interest till due, fifteen hundred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases