1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 2 U.S.
  5. 2 U.S. 264 (1796)
 

STILES v. DONALDSON

Not in source.

2 U.S. 264 (1796)

2 Dall. 264

STILES, Plf. in Er., versus DONALDSON.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

September 1, 1796.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ingersoll, for the Defendant in Error.

Condy, for the Plaintiff in Error.

But THE COURT were, unanimously, of opinion, that the accounts, on which the set-off had been claimed, were not within the act of Limitations; and that the Common Pleas had done right in admitting the evidence offered by the defendant.

Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases