1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 31 U.S.
  5. 31 U.S. 216 (1832)
 

EX PARTE ROBERTS

Not in source.

31 U.S. 216 (1832)

6 Pet. 216

8 L.Ed. 375

EX PARTE JOSEPH ROBERTS, AND EX PARTE GEORGE ADSHEAD.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 28, 1832.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The motion for a mandamus was argued in writing by Mr Beardsley, as counsel for the claimants.

Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

The court is of opinion that the present is not a proper case for the interposition of this court, by way of mandamus. The application to set aside the default and inquest, was an application to the discretion of the district court; and is not distinguishable in principle from applications to grant new trials. This court has always considered such applications as resting in the sound discretion of the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases