1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 3 U.S.
  5. 3 U.S. 19 (1795)
 

BINGHAM v. CABOT

Not in source.

3 U.S. 19 (1795)

3 Dall. 19

1 L.Ed. 491

BINGHAM, Plaintiff in error, v. CABOT et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 2, 1795.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The argument (which commenced on the 15th of February, 1795) was conducted by Bradford (Attorney-General of the United States) and Lewis, for the Plaintiff in error; and by Ingersoll, Dexter, and E. Tilghman, for the Defendant in error.

On the 27th of February, the Court delivered their opinion to the following effect.

PATTERSON, Justice. —

Considering, as I do, that all the papers transmitted from the Circuit Court, upon a return to the writ of error, form a part of the record in this cause, I am clearly of opinion, that the subject matter of the controversy, is fully and exclusively of Admiralty jurisdiction.

IREDELL, Justice. —...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases