1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 41 U.S.
  5. 41 U.S. 169 (1842)
 

HYDE AND GLEISES v. BOORAEM AND COMPANY

Not in source.

41 U.S. 169 (1842)

16 Pet. 169

10 L.Ed. 925

HYDE AND GLEISES, AND H. LOCKET, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. BOORAEM AND COMPANY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 9, 1842.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Key and Mr. Henderson argued the cause for the plaintiffs in error; and Mr. Coxe appeared and argued the cause for the defendants.

Mr. Coxe, for the defendants in error,

Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is the case of a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the eastern district of Louisiana. The original suit was brought conformably to the Louisiana practice by petition, in which Booraem and Company, the original petitioners, state, that two of the original defendants, Hyde and Gleises, merchants of New Orleans, being indebted to the petitioners in a considerable sum, did, in April, 1837, deliver to the petitioners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases