1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 3 U.S.
  5. 3 U.S. 199 (1796)
 

JONES v. HYLTON

Not in source.

3 U.S. 199 (1796)

3 Dall. 199

1 L.Ed. 568

WARE, administrator of JONES, Plaintiff in error, v. HYLTON et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 7, 1796.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Tilghman, for the Plaintiff in error.

Marshall, (of Virginia) for the Defendant in error.

Campbell, of Virginia, on the same side.

Wilcocks, for the Plaintiff in error.

Lewis, for the Plaintiff in error.

THE COURT, after great consideration, delivered their opinions, seriatim, as follow:

CHACE, Justice. —

The Defendants in error, on the 7th day of July, 1774, passed their penal bond to Farrell and Jones, for the payment of 2,976l. 11s. 6d. of good British money; but the condition of the bond, or the time of payment, does not appear on the record. On the 20th of October, 1777, the legislature...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases