1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 2 U.S.
  5. 2 U.S. 196 (1793)
 

PLEASANTS v. PEMBERTON

Not in source.

2 U.S. 196 (1793)

2 Dall. 196

PLEASANTS, Adm'tor, versus PEMBERTON, Adm'trix.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 1, 1793.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ingersoll, for the plaintiff.

M`KEAN, Chief Justice.

The general expression in Walton & Shelley must be limited as explained in 3 Term. 33. 6. and, therefore, since the witness is disinterested, he must be admitted. Besides, he is not to contradict the writing, or deny any thing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases