1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 3 U.S.
  5. 3 U.S. 184 (1796)
 

HILLS v. ROSS

Not in source.

3 U.S. 184 (1796)

3 Dall. 184

1 L.Ed. 562

HILLS et al Plaintiffs in error, v. ROSS.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 26, 1796.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

But Cox and Du Ponceau, for the Plaintiffs in error.

THE COURT were, unanimously, of opinion, that the error assigned, was not a sufficient ground for reversing the decree, and recommended to the parties to come to some agreement, which might bring the matters in controversy fairly before them.

After some conversation, an agreement took place between the council on both sides, that the cause should be continued to the next term; and that, in the mean time, new evidence

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases