1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 2 U.S.
  5. 2 U.S. 144 (1792)
 

GORGERAT v. M`CARTY

Not in source.

2 U.S. 144 (1792)

2 Dall. 144

GORGERAT et al., versus M`CARTY.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 1, 1792.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was argued on the 15th September, 1791, by Rawle and Duponceau, for the plaintiffs, and by Ingersoll for the defendant.

The Judges now (Jan. 1792) delivered their opinions seriatim as follows:

BRADFORD, Justice.

This is an action brought against the acceptor of a bill of exchange, which had been several times specially indorsed, and the plaintiffs are the first of those indorsors. At the trial the plaintiffs gave no direct proof of payment to the last indorsee, insisting that possession of the bill and protest was sufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases