1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 46 U.S.
  5. 46 U.S. 91 (1847)
 

BRIDGES ET AL. v. ARMOUR ET AL

Not in source.

46 U.S. 91 (1847)

5 How. 91

12 L.Ed. 64

HENRY D. BRIDGES, JOHN K. MABRAY, JAMES N. HARPER, AND STERN SIMMONDS, LATE MERCHANTS AND PARTNERS IN TRADE, UNDER THE NAME, FIRM, AND STYLE OF BRIDGES, MABRAY, AND COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM ARMOUR, HENRY LAKE, AND FELIX WALKER, LATE MERCHANTS AND PARTNERS IN TRADE, UNDER THE NAME, FIRM, AND STYLE OF ARMOUR, LAKE, AND WALKER, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 15, 1847.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was argued by Mr. Coxe, for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Chalmers, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Coxe.

Mr. Chalmers, for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

Whether a party on the record, divested of all interest in the result of the suit, and therefore unexceptionable on that ground, is a competent witness or not in the cause, can scarcely be regarded as an open question in this court, after what has already fallen from it.

It is true, as stated by the counsel in the argument, that in all the cases in which the question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases