WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner,
v.
MENASHA CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 29, 2007.
Decided July 11, 2008.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the petitioner-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by F. Thomas Creeron III, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was J.B. Van Hollen, attorney general.
For the respondent-appellant there were briefs by Andrew L. Nelson, Michael B. Van Sicklen, and Foley & Lardner L.L.P., Madison, and Maureen A. McGinnity and Foley & Lardner L.L.P., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Maureen A. McGinnity.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Rebecca Kathryn Mason, Brady Williamson, and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Madison, on behalf of Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
¶ 1 ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, J.
This is a review of a published court of appeals' decision,1 which reversed the decision of the Dane County Circuit Court, Steven D. Ebert, Judge. In the underlying dispute between Menasha Corporation (Menasha) and the Wisconsin Department of Revenue (DOR), the Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission2 (Commission) concluded that the "R/3 System," which Menasha purchased from...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
