1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 179 A.3d
  5. 179 A.3d 727 (2017)
 

IN RE HINESBURG HANNAFORD ACT 250 PERMIT

Nos. 16-273 & 16-274.

179 A.3d 727 (2017)

2017 VT 106

IN RE HINESBURG HANNAFORD ACT 250 PERMIT. In re Hinesburg Hannaford Site Plan Approval (Mary Beth Bowman, et al., Appellants).

Supreme Court of Vermont.

November 9, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan R. Keyes of Ryan Smith & Carbine, LTD., Rutland, and James A. Dumont of Law Office of James A. Dumont, P.C., Bristol, for Appellants.

William H. Sorrell , Attorney General, and Kyle H. Landis-Marinello , Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for Appellee Vermont Natural Resources Board.

David W. Rugh of Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C., Burlington, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Town of Hinesburg.

Christopher D. Roy of Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC, Burlington, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Martin's Foods of South Burlington, LLC.

PRESENT: Dooley, Skoglund, Robinson and Eaton, JJ., and Wesley, Supr. J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.

¶ 1. These two consolidated appeals challenge the Environmental Division's decisions concerning applications for site-plan approval and an Act 250 permit for the proposed construction of a Hannaford's supermarket in the Town of Hinesburg. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases