1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 141 S.Ct.
  5. 141 S.Ct. 989 (2021)
 

TORRES v. MADRID

No. 19-292.

141 S.Ct. 989 (2021)

592 U.S. 306

Roxanne TORRES, Petitioner v. Janice MADRID, et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 25, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kelsi B. Corkran, Washington, DC, for the petitioner.

Rebecca Taibleson for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting vacatur and remand.

Mark D. Standridge, Las Cruces, NM, for the respondents.

Kelsi Brown Corkran, Counsel of Record, Thomas M. Bondy, Ethan P. Fallon, Sheila Baynes, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Easha Anand, Rachel G. Shalev, Abigail Colella, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, for petitioner.

Mark D. Standridge, Counsel of Record, Jarmie & Rogers, P.C., Cruces, NM, Mark D. Jarmie Jarmie & Rogers, P.C., Albuquerque, NM, Christina L. G. Brennan, James P. Sullivan, Brennan & Sullivan, PA, Santa Fe, NM, Elizabeth Anne Trickey, New Mexico Dept. of Public Safety, Santa Fe, NM, for respondents.

The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable "seizures" to safeguard "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons." Under our cases, an officer seizes a person when he uses force to apprehend her. The question in this case is whether a seizure occurs when an officer shoots someone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases