1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 138 S.Ct.
  5. 138 S.Ct. 1491 (2018)
 

DAHDA v. U.S.

No. 17-43.

138 S.Ct. 1491 (2018)

584 U.S. 440

Los Rovell DAHDA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES. Roosevelt Rico Dahda, Petitioner v. United States.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 14, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.

Zachary D. Tripp, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Rick E. Bailey, Conlee, Schmidt, & Emerson, LLP, Wichita, KS, Edward K. Fehlig, Jr., Fehlig & Fehlig-Tatum, LLC, St. Louis, MO, Kannon K. Shanmugam, Amy Mason Saharia, Allison Jones Rushing, Charles L. McCloud, J. Liat Rome, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, D.C., for Petitioners.

Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, John P. Cronan, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Eric J. Feigin, Zachary D. Tripp, Assistants to the Solicitor General, Finnuala K. Tessier, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

A federal statute allows judges to issue wiretap orders authorizing the interception of communications to help prevent, detect, or prosecute serious federal crimes. See Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. The statute requires the judge to find...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases