1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 136 S.Ct.
  5. 136 S.Ct. 1885 (2016)
 

DIETZ v. BOULDIN

No. 15-458.

136 S.Ct. 1885 (2016)

195 L. Ed. 2d 161

Rocky DIETZ, petitioner v. Hillary BOULDIN.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 9, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Neal K. Katyal, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

John F. Bash for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting the respondent.

Geoffrey C. Angel, Angel Law Firm, Bozeman, MT, Kannon K. Shanmugam, Allison B. Jones, Nicholas T. Matich, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Leila K. Mongan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jesse Beaudette, Bohyer, Erickson, Beaudette & Tranel, P.C., Missoula, MT, Neal Kumar Katyal, Frederick Liu, Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak, Daniel J.T. Schuker, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, for respondent.

In this case, a jury returned a legally impermissible verdict. The trial judge did not realize the error until shortly after he excused the jury. He brought the jury back and ordered them to deliberate again to correct the mistake. The question before us is whether a federal district court can...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases