1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 135 S.Ct.
  5. 135 S.Ct. 907 (2015)
 

HANA FINANCIAL, INC. v. HANA BANK

No. 13-1211.

135 S.Ct. 907 (2015)

HANA FINANCIAL, INC., Petitioner v. HANA BANK, et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 21, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul W. Hughes, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Carlo F. Van den Bosch, Costa Mesa, CA, for Respondents.

Sarah E. Harrington, for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting the Respondents.

Charles A. Rothfeld, Counsel of Record, Paul W. Hughes, James F. Tierney, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Carlo F. Van den Bosch, Counsel of Record, Robert D. Rose, Michelle LaVoie Wisniewski, Gazal Pour-Moezzi, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, Costa Mesa, CA, for Respondents.

Rights in a trademark are determined by the date of the mark's first use in commerce. The party who first uses a mark in commerce is said to have priority over other users. Recognizing that trademark users ought to be permitted to make certain modifications to their marks over time without losing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases