ROE v. BIBBY

No. 5273.

410 S.C. 287 (2014)

763 S.E.2d 645

Jane ROE, as parent and natural guardian of Judy Roe, James Roe, and Joyce Roe, Minor Children Under the Age of Eighteen, Appellants, v. Daniel BIBBY Sr. and Michelle Bibby, Defendants, Of whom Michelle Bibby is the Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided October 1, 2014.

Rehearing Denied October 23, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric Marc Poulin , of Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC, of North Charleston, for Appellants.

Eugene P. Corrigan, III , and J.W. Nelson Chandler , both of Corrigan & Chandler, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.


LOCKEMY, J.

Jane Roe, as parent and natural guardian of Judy Roe, James Roe, and Joyce Roe, minor children under the age of eighteen (minor Appellants), (collectively with Roe, Appellants) argues the circuit court erred in granting Michelle Bibby's (Respondent) motion for summary judgment. Appellants argue Respondent had a duty to warn them under the special relationship exception and a premises liability theory. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases