1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 384 S.C.
  5. 384 S.C. 203 (2009)
 

WATT v. PIEDMONT AUTOMOTIVE

No. 4572.

384 S.C. 203 (2009)

681 S.E.2d 615

Roger Dale WATT, Respondent, v. PIEDMONT AUTOMOTIVE and Piedmont Chrysler Plymouth, Employers, and AmComp and S.C. Automobile Dealers Association, Carrier, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided June 25, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weston Adams, III, Jillian M. Benson, Ashley B. Stratton, and Helen Hiser of Columbia, for Appellants.

Louise E. Mozingo, of Camden, for Secondary Appellants.

William N. Epps, Jr., Samantha P. Nelson, of Anderson, for Respondent.

HUFF, J.

Piedmont Automotive and Piedmont Chrysler Plymouth, Employers, and AmComp and South Carolina Automobile Dealers Association, Carriers, (collectively Employers) appeal the order to the circuit court reversing the Appellate Panel of the Workers' Compensation Commission's decision denying Roger Dale Watt's claim for benefits. We reverse.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Watt began working with Piedmont Honda as a technician and team leader in 1991...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases