PROGRESSIVE UNIVERSAL INS. CO. v. VOYLES

No. A176113.

337 Or. App. 381 (2025)

PROGRESSIVE UNIVERSAL INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Aura VOYLES, an individual, Defendant, and Vance VOYLES, an individual, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

January 8, 2025.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse A. Buss argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs was Willamette Law Group, PC.

Jonathan Henderson argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Davis Rothwell Earle & Xóchihua, P.C.

Before Joyce, Presiding Judge, Lagesen, Chief, Judge, and DeVore, Senior Judge.


DeVORE, S. J.

Affirmed.

Aura and Vance Voyles are covered under a policy of uninsured and underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) insurance.1 Vance Voyles appeals a judgment that declares that the policy with Progressive Universal Insurance Company (Progressive) provides $50,000-per-person UIM limits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases