1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 556 P.3d
  5. 556 P.3d 1065 (2024)
 

NEICE v. PROSPER PORTLAND

A184437.

556 P.3d 1065 (2024)

334 Or. App. 735

Joan NEICE and Michael Galizio, Petitioners, v. PROSPER PORTLAND and City of Portland, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

September 5, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ross Day and Day Law, P.C., filed the brief for petitioners.

Linly Rees filed the brief for respondents.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, Powers, Judge, and Hellman, Judge.

Petitioners seek judicial review of a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) granting the City of Portland and Prosper Portland's motion to dismiss for lack of common law jurisdiction. Petitioner had challenged Prosper Portland's Resolution 7512.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases