1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.App.
  4. 322 Or.App.
  5. 322 Or.App. 551
 

H. D. v. STENBECK

Nos. 20SK02548; A175588.

322 Or.App. 551

H. D., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Joshua Phillip STENBECK, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

October 26, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andy Simrin argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs were Andy Simrin PC and Craig M. Arnold.

Christopher W. Peterman argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Keith D. Ropp and Christopher W. Peterman, Attorney at Law, P.C.

Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Pagán, Judge.

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

SHORR, P. J.

Reversed.

Respondent appeals from a judgment imposing a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) against him pursuant to ORS 30.866. He raises two assignments of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases