PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for recklessly endangering another person, arguing that the trial court plainly erred by failing to sua sponte instruct the jury that it must agree as to which of several driving maneuvers formed the basis of its verdict, and which of several other drivers on the road were endangered by that...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.