1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 499 P.3d
  5. 499 P.3d 100 (2021)
 

PADILLA v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

A170284.

499 P.3d 100 (2021)

314 Or. App. 300

Danielle PADILLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

September 9, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander W. Pletch argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Emily K. Shack and Shlesinger & deVilleneuve Attorneys, P.C.

Ralph C. Spooner, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were David E. Smith, and Spooner & Much, PC.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

In Oregon, persons injured in automobile accidents are entitled, by statute, to certain personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. ORS 742.524(1)(b) provides that, as part of those benefits, an injured person is entitled to lost wages in certain circumstances but that "[t]his benefit is subject to a maximum payment of $3,000 per month...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases