PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted by jury verdict of violating a stalking protective order, ORS 163.750(2)(b). On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We reject that argument without discussion. Further, he argues that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it need not reach...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.