1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 471 P.3d
  5. 471 P.3d 786 (2020)
 

C. Q. R. v. WAFULA

A161470.

471 P.3d 786 (2020)

305 Or. App. 344

C. Q. R., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Phillip Wekesa WAFULA, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

July 8, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth E. Kahn II argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Ivan Resendiz Gutierrez, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Cody J. Elliott, Sanja Muranovic, and Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP.

Before DeHoog, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge.

Petitioner obtained a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) after respondent initiated a series of contacts with her over several months. Respondent appeals the SPO judgment, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, and a supplemental judgment for attorney fees. For the following reasons, we conclude that the trial court did not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases