C. P. v. MITTELBACH

A166230.

468 P.3d 496 (2020)

304 Or. App. 569

C. P., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Brock Robert MITTELBACH, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

June 10, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andy Simrin argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief was Andy Simrin PC.

Rolf C. Moan , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and James, Judge.


Appealing from a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) that petitioner obtained against him, respondent challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the SPO.1 We conclude that the evidence was sufficient for the trial court to conclude, as required under ORS 163.738(2)(a)(B), that respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases